Submit-pandemic scores on Nation’s Report Card slip extra in states Kamala Harris gained simply
States are the “laboratory” of democracy, opined Supreme Court docket Justice Louis Brandeis. That laboratory swung into motion when states launched considerably completely different insurance policies as Covid-19 swept throughout the nation in early 2020. In some locations, colleges closed their buildings and switched to distant studying for a 12 months or extra, whereas in others the college door reopened by the beginning of the autumn. Surprisingly, college closures and different social distancing insurance policies usually had extra to do with the political coloration of a state or district than with the chance that youngsters and lecturers would undergo severely from the virus.
The politicization of faculty coverage proved unlucky for youngsters. But the truth that pandemic mitigation measures had been closely formed by politics permits one to acquire a tough estimate of their results on scholar studying just by evaluating tendencies in states with various hues—pink, blue, or purple.
Right here we use knowledge from the Nationwide Evaluation of Academic Progress, or NAEP, to match the pandemic-era studying loss throughout states grouped by the share of the two-party vote that went for Kamala Harris within the 2024 presidential election. We divide states into three near-equal classes (see desk) and provides them the traditional colours for Republican, Democratic, and swing states. We think about tendencies in scholar efficiency from spring 2019 to 2024 on every of the 4 exams that NAEP frequently administers: 4th- and Eighth-grade studying and math. We have in mind variation in scholar demographics throughout states and over time by counting on adjusted NAEP scores revealed by Matthew Chingos and Kristen Blagg on the City Institute.
State Classes
We divide the 50 states into thirds based mostly on the share of the two-party vote that went for Kamala Harris within the 2024 presidential election.
| Pink states | Blue states | Purple states |
|
Alabama Arkansas Idaho Indiana Kentucky Louisiana Mississippi Montana Nebraska North Dakota Oklahoma South Dakota Tennessee Utah West Virginia Wyoming |
California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Hawaii Illinois Maine Maryland Massachusetts New Jersey New Mexico New York Oregon Rhode Island Vermont Virginia Washington |
Alaska Arizona Florida Georgia Iowa Kansas Michigan Minnesota Missouri Nevada New Hampshire North Carolina Ohio Pennsylvania South Carolina Texas Wisconsin |
Findings
Scholar studying and math efficiency nationwide in 2024 stays considerably under pre-pandemic ranges in each 4th and Eighth grade. The identical is true in all three teams of states. However the downward slope is significantly steeper for college kids residing in blue states than for these in pink states, with these in purple states falling someplace in between (see determine). Every of the reported variations between pink and blue states within the slope of the development from 2019 to 2024 is statistically vital.
Scholar Scores Slide Farthest in Blue States
On all 4 NAEP exams, college students in states that strongly supported Kamala Harris fell extra steeply between 2019 to 2024 than college students in states that strongly supported Donald Trump.
Supply: Nationwide Heart for Schooling Statistics and the City Institute
Word: Authors’ calculations
In 2019, the typical studying scores of 4th-grade college students after adjusting for demographics are highest within the deep blue states, lowest within the deep pink states, with purple states hovering within the center. By 2024, the reverse is true. Pink states rank highest, blue states lowest.
In Eighth-grade studying, college students in blue states in 2019 have a slender edge over these in purple states and a sizeable one over red-state college students. By 2024, the three units of states are basically tied.
In 4th-grade math, college students in purple states rating increased in 2019 than these in pink and blue states, that are basically tied. All three units of states take a horrible tumble in 2022, then get better considerably in 2024, at which level pink states meet up with (and barely surpass) purple states. Blue states path nicely behind the opposite two teams in the newest knowledge.
In Eighth-grade math, purple states start in 2019 with the very best common rating, holding a slender benefit over blue states and a bigger one over pink states. All three units of states undergo a extreme drop between 2019 and 2022. By 2024, the blue and purple states proceed to slip downward, whereas pink states get better considerably. By this level pink and purple states are basically tied, nicely forward of blue states.
Doable explanations
The differential extent of faculty closures through the pandemic is the almost definitely clarification for the differential achievement tendencies throughout states. Quite a few research present higher studying loss in locations that closed colleges for longer intervals of time. Nevertheless, we can not rule out the likelihood that the variations throughout states additionally mirror different pandemic-era laws each in colleges and in society extra typically. Social and emotional misery registered through the Covid years might have been pushed partially by common social isolation and have had its personal antagonistic influence on studying.
Collective bargaining preparations might assist to elucidate each the extent of faculty closures and their penalties. In some blue states, colleges couldn’t open with out the approval of lecturers unions, and in some left-leaning areas, unions threatened strikes except time-consuming college enhancements—air filters, bigger areas to facilitate distancing, and so forth—had been carried out. Additionally, instructor absenteeism might have been facilitated by beneficiant illness and private depart insurance policies negotiated by unions. Proper-to-work legal guidelines in lots of deep pink states might restrict the power of unionized workers to limit college opening and associated measures.
College alternative ranks among the many attainable, however much less doubtless, explanations for red-blue state variations. Public colleges have suffered sizeable enrollment declines for the reason that pandemic, homeschooling is on the rise, and a number of other pink states have lately handed legal guidelines that assist finance entry to the non-public sector. Public colleges had been extra doubtless open after they confronted higher competitors from Catholic colleges, and the wave of faculty alternative legal guidelines that unfold throughout pink states after 2018 might have enhanced public colleges’ responsiveness to demand for open colleges. However, the selection sector stays a small a part of the schooling panorama even in pink states, and state-level NAEP knowledge exclude college students attending non-public colleges. Extra fine-grained analyses might discern whether or not college alternative affected charges of studying loss.
Join the EdNext Weekly e-newsletter, and keep updated with the Every day Digest, delivered straight to your inbox.
Larger federal funding for southern colleges is one other attainable, if much less doubtless, clarification. Pink states obtain extra federal schooling {dollars} than different states, on common, as a result of they’ve extra low-income college students eligible for the compensatory schooling program. The $185 billion improve in federal schooling funding through the pandemic was administered in keeping with the identical system, doubtless leading to a disproportionate allocation to pink states. Nevertheless, latest analysis exhibits that the consequences of those extra funds on post-pandemic scholar efficiency are too small to account for the substantial variations between the charges of decline in pink and blue states.
The “science of studying” has exploded in reputation for the reason that pandemic. The “Mississippi miracle” and up to date positive factors in Louisiana might each be attributable in some extent to a return to an old school strategy to instruction that could be extra common in Trump states than Harris states. However, science-of-reading legal guidelines haven’t evoked partisan debate and have change into common throughout the nation, even in New York Metropolis. And, in our knowledge, it’s in math reasonably than studying that 4th-grade college students in pink states make the most important relative positive factors.
It’s tempting to attribute educational decline to college students spending ever extra time on smartphones, tablets, and different tech devices. Maybe it’s the college students within the wealthier blue states which can be particularly doubtless to purchase and use these gadgets. We doubt it. The price of entry to screens of every kind has dwindled, and college students all over the place are enticed to make use of them to connect with friends. Nonetheless, we can not rule out the likelihood that tech and social media are additionally a part of the story.
Conclusion
The high-level outcomes we’ve shared are solely a place to begin for understanding the consequences of state coverage decisions on scholar studying. We deal with math and studying achievement in simply two grade ranges, as these are the one domains for which comparable knowledge can be found throughout states. We don’t break college students into subgroups, as a result of the City Institute solely stories demographically adjusted tendencies for all college students. When students can draw upon knowledge from districts, colleges, and particular person college students, they may have the ability to check with higher precision the extent to which differential state insurance policies contributed to the steep decline in scholar math and studying efficiency documented by the NAEP.
Some would possibly want to rejoice the decline in long-standing geographical disparities in achievement between pink and blue states. However most will probably be alarmed that so many U.S. college students suffered such a extreme decline from the pandemic, producing losses that stay sizeable 4 years after the Covid outbreak in math—and in studying now present indicators of additional slippage.
If our outcomes are validated by additional analysis, the coverage implications are immense. The danger of pandemics stays nice. Ought to such a dreadful occasion happen once more sooner or later, governments will, we hope, notice they should steadiness short-term public well being penalties in opposition to long-term academic ones.
Michael Hartney is an affiliate professor of political science at Boston Faculty, the Bruni Household Fellow at Stanford College’s Hoover Establishment, and a Senior Fellow on the Manhattan Institute. Paul E. Peterson is the Director of the Program on Schooling Coverage and Governance and the Henry Lee Shattuck Professor of Authorities at Harvard College, and a Senior Fellow on the Hoover Establishment.
Final Up to date
NEWSLETTER
Notify Me When Schooling Subsequent
Posts a Large Story
Copyright © 2025 President & Fellows of Harvard Faculty
