Join Chalkbeat Detroit’s free e-newsletter to maintain up with town’s public college system and Michigan training coverage.
Researchers Sarah Winchell Lenhoff and Jeremy Singer have been learning persistent absenteeism in Detroit for years, speaking to scores of oldsters, college students, educators, and faculty directors alongside the best way, and preserving monitor of many college efforts to cut back absenteeism.
One factor they’ve discovered throughout that point is that irrespective of how a lot ardour colleges put into fixing the persistent absenteeism downside, they could be preventing a dropping battle. That’s as a result of whereas persistent absenteeism “is an issue for colleges,” it’s not an issue that may be solved by colleges.
Their new e-book, “Rethinking Persistent Absenteeism: Why Colleges Can’t Remedy it Alone,” which was launched Tuesday by Harvard Schooling Press, explains why and gives a street map for what they describe as an “ecological” as a substitute of an “academic” method to addressing persistent absenteeism.
Why? As a result of poverty weighs closely into the explanations college students miss college, significantly in communities like Detroit the place the overwhelming majority of scholars come from low-income houses.
Persistent absenteeism has been an issue in Detroit for years and can be affecting college districts throughout Michigan. Statewide, almost 30% of scholars have been thought of chronically absent, which means they missed 10 or extra days of college, throughout the 2023-24 college yr, in keeping with state knowledge. Within the Detroit Public Colleges Group District, the speed was almost 66%. Many constitution colleges within the metropolis even have excessive charges of persistent absenteeism.

affiliate professor of academic management and coverage research at Wayne State College. (Courtesy of Sarah Winchell Lenhoff)
The pandemic fueled a surge in persistent absenteeism, although charges have since decreased.
The e-book has various suggestions for policymakers, college and district leaders, and community-based organizations and coalitions.
“I hope that people outdoors of training decide up the e-book and suppose sure, there’s a task for me in well being, or for me in housing, for me in transportation, or for me as a lawmaker,” mentioned Singer, an assistant professor of academic management and coverage research at Wayne State College.
For policymakers, who’ve the facility to legislate change, the authors suggest they considerably growing efforts to cut back poverty, eradicate punishments for colleges and college students for persistent absenteeism, spend money on methods to make sure college students have the sources they want, and scale back the emphasis on persistent absenteeism inside college accountability methods.

Lenhoff mentioned she hopes the e-book will shatter stereotypes folks might have that kids who’re chronically absent aren’t motivated to attend college and that their mother and father don’t care.
“Detroit mother and father need their children at school,” mentioned Lenhoff, the Leonard Kaplan Endowed Professor and an affiliate professor of academic management and coverage research at Wayne State. “Many mother and father, even mother and father who’ve children with actually good attendance, are going to extraordinarily nice lengths to get their kids to high school, coordinating all types of various sources and backup transportation.”
Lenhoff and Singer lead the Detroit Partnership for Schooling Fairness & Analysis, or Detroit PEER, with Lenhoff as its director and Singer as its affiliate director.
Chalkbeat talked with Lenhoff and Singer in a wide-ranging interview about persistent absenteeism.
The dialog has been edited for size and readability. Keep tuned for extra later this week.
Your e-book makes the argument that an ecological method to persistent absenteeism is required. Why is there such a must rethink the best way communities method this downside?
Lenhoff: That’s an enormous motive why we wrote this e-book was feeling an actual must have an intervention on the present discourse round persistent absenteeism and attendance in colleges. In Michigan, and nearly all of states across the nation, persistent absence is counted in opposition to colleges after they have many college students who’re lacking a lot of college. We’ve noticed how that has seeped into the on a regular basis practices of colleges, such that a lot of individuals are excited about persistent absence, a lot of individuals are making an attempt to do one thing about it. They’re spending a number of time on issues that won’t have a number of profit for college kids, might not have the ability to enhance attendance, which signifies that they’re not spending time on different issues that may be extra inside their scope of affect.
The second large factor is we actually wished to develop the desk of individuals and establishments who’re excited about pupil attendance as a part of their scope of labor. Primarily colleges are like the one establishments the place we glance to unravel this concern. A number of different establishments are perhaps even in a greater place to unravel a few of the root causes which might be preserving children from college … issues like housing instability, issues like transportation inequity, well being inequity, you realize, a number of this stuff are actually far outdoors what colleges can do, and so trying to different establishments to see what they’ll do to enhance circumstances for pupil attendance looks like a extremely necessary transfer.
What’s going to it take for varsity districts, Detroit specifically, or communities, to tug off what you’re recommending?
Lenhoff: It’s all of the harder within the present political local weather the place colleges are more likely to have much less funding, no more. There’s going to be a deemphasis on issues like social welfare applications and inexpensive housing, and equitable transportation. Issues we expect could make a distinction are on this present federal political local weather going to be actually difficult to tug off. What I’d say now could be that working intently with the nonprofit group, with the type of native authorities companies that you have already got connections with which might be perhaps already making an attempt to do issues round youth programming or supportive work with households, and simply making an attempt to attach the dots with attendance. A variety of teams are already excited about children. They’re excited about households with children — methods to higher assist them, methods to improve employment alternatives, improve extracurricular engagement. All this stuff, we expect may have a optimistic impact on attendance, and so they may require a bit of little bit of coordination on the varsity facet.
Singer: If there are policymakers who’re pondering, ‘What may we do now, understanding that we have now an necessary position to play,’ it may make sense to even simply attempt small block grants or pilot applications that may assist colleges attempt some artistic issues in partnership with group organizations or different state companies. The identical goes for philanthropy. Foundations may have the ability to play a task in simply serving to to pilot one thing that may be in any other case unattainable financially, like giving rideshare credit or experimenting with some new type of … transportation, or some type of new well being intervention or offering well being providers. If there’s a technique to attempt them at a smaller scale and begin to establish promising fashions that we may then develop to different locations that will be an amazing alternative.
There’s no lack of advocacy round tackling these points in Detroit. However what position ought to or can the Metropolis of Detroit mayor’s workplace play, and the way pivotal that involvement could be?
Singer: We’ve a mayoral race arising, and I’d like to see the following mayor of Detroit each acknowledge this as a difficulty however acknowledge the roots of this concern in the precise approach. We’ve heard Detroit Superintendent [Nikolai] Vitti communicate to this concern by way of figuring out the basis causes of poverty and inequality and the lengthy historical past of that. Public figures can play a extremely nice position in serving to to set the tone for the way we take into consideration these issues. And so listening to the mayor communicate to the truth that town and departments inside the metropolis must play a task within the resolution — as a result of the issue lies in issues like transportation challenges, well being issues, monetary pressure on households, housing points —could be a extremely great spot to begin.
Lenhoff: it’s more likely to be a precedence for any new administration centered on financial and neighborhood growth, proper, and making an attempt to extend the inhabitants of Detroit, or at the least stabilize it, these conversations by and huge, you realize, to the extent that I’m conscious of them, largely don’t have have a lot to do about colleges. Colleges should not typically on the desk in these conversations about which neighborhoods we’re going to spend money on, the place we’re going to quote inexpensive housing, the place we’re going to spend money on new industrial exercise. should you’re making an attempt to make a walkable neighborhood, a college needs to be a part of that calculus, that you need to have the ability to stroll to an area public college, and since it’s an necessary useful resource. The inexpensive housing piece is important. You already know, investing in inexpensive housing that’s sufficiently big for households and that’s close to colleges, proper? I’ve heard people speak about constructing inexpensive housing for households, and so they’re like, one-bedroom models. What does a household really must dwell in a house over the long run and keep there?
Sarah, you talked about that you realize that there are some issues that that colleges have achieved that aren’t essentially useful? What are a few of these strategies?
Lenhoff: A few of the large ones need to do with the punitive approaches to pupil attendance. We’ve seen some transfer to deficit excited about household … results in this dynamic the place the varsity is perhaps not making an attempt to construct a trusting relationship with a household in order that they’ll (be taught) what limitations they face. The e-book exhibits that it’s actually time consuming to construct robust relationships with households. However that may be the basis of determining what’s happening and fixing these points. As a substitute, colleges are spending a number of time on issues that perhaps take much less time, and perhaps are more cost effective, however perhaps don’t have the burden of constructing these robust relationships. One instance is we see a number of short-term, incentive-based approaches. Colleges love incentives. They love, you realize, they like to have fun the youngsters, and they need to. However there’s little or no proof that these types of issues really enhance attendance.
What do you say to those that really feel very strongly that there must be some type of punitive consequence for persistent absenteeism?
Lenhoff: It’s finally a mirrored image of colleges and districts attending to the tip of their rope and feeling like they’re not in a position to absolutely remedy this concern alone. However these are counterintuitive methods of fixing the issue, as a result of they erode the very issues which might be on the core of fine attendance. So punitive approaches like courtroom prosecution can erode college household relationships and weaken households, mother and father and college students, ties to the district, that sense of belonging or engagement. You already know, taking away social providers is eliminating sources which might be essential to truly enabling common participation at school if a household has monetary points or some, some host of issues relating to people who trigger them to overlook college.
Lori Higgins is the bureau chief for Chalkbeat Detroit and covers Detroit college points. You possibly can attain her at [email protected].