Postman is a well-liked utility programming interface (API) platform with a whole ecosystem of companies. Numerous different instruments provide related options and functionalities to Postman for various use circumstances and desires. Selecting one of the best amongst Postman alternate options is like deciding between LeBron James and Usain Bolt. These alternate options are like area of interest energy instruments in a developer’s package. They might not be as universally referred to as Postman, however usually sharper and extra environment friendly for the job at hand.
I selected the preferred instruments in the marketplace; some would possibly even be in your thoughts whereas contemplating an API consumer or a platform. Let’s rapidly have a look at one of the best Postman alternate options out there in 2025.
Finest 6 Postman alternate options for 2025
- APIdog is finest for collaborative work in API administration. ($9/month)
- Bruno is an open-source, git-integrated API consumer that doesn’t sync any information to the cloud. ($6/month)
- Kong Insomnia is one of the best for REST and GraphQL API testing and debugging. (Customized Pricing)
- Stoplight is one of the best for designing APIs in OpenAPI and JSON Schema. ($41 / month)
- Swagger is usually used for API design, documentation, and improvement collaboration. ($22.80 /month)
- Thunder Consumer is nice for light-weight API testing inside Visible Studio Code. (free)
The merchandise are listed alphabetically and embody a mixture of API shoppers and platforms listed on G2. Most of them provide a free model or a free trial. I’ve included the beginning value of their paid plan for simple comparability.
What makes one of the best Postman alternate options?
Postman is a well-liked API platform with an ecosystem of instruments and companies. It’s straightforward to check paperwork and handle requisitions. I may combine Postman with a CI/CD pipeline to watch APIs and create mock servers for superior utilization.
Nevertheless, when you’re in search of a Postman various, you could search a instrument that higher enhances your use case and have necessities. Or, possibly, you need one thing less complicated than Postman.
For instance, if testing isn’t your main concern and also you desire a extra versatile instrument, Kong Insomnia could be a more sensible choice. For an open-source and Git-friendly platform, Bruno could be one of the best wager. Due to this fact, the “finest” varies for each distinctive want.
Primarily based on my expertise, a powerful postman various ought to:
- Be higher than Postman for a particular use case. These alternate options can both work higher the place Postman falls quick or a minimum of work equally to Postman however provide extra worth.
- Serve a novel function. These instruments would possibly serve a specific want that’s distinctive to the consumer. For instance, Thunder Consumer is appropriate for API testing inside Visible Studio (VS) Code.
- Be less complicated to work with. Postman is a complete API platform, however not everybody wants such an in depth platform. Some shoppers would possibly need one thing extra simple — a minimal instrument that addresses their wants.
- Work the place you’re. The choice would work on a Mac, Desktop, or Home windows machine. Some may additionally work in a browser.
High 6 Postman alternate options I discover priceless
Under are the main Postman alternate options I discovered in the marketplace. They provide aggressive—or, in some circumstances, higher—worth than Postman.
This listing is predicated on G2 opinions from 2025. We’ll maintain updating it to mirror the newest and finest alternate options. Some opinions might have been edited for readability.
This information was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some opinions might have been edited for readability.
1. APIdog: Finest for combining API improvement and documentation workflow
APIdog is a Postman various, which I consider is one of the best on the market when in search of a full-featured API platform. It has obtain choices for Mac, Home windows, Linux, and totally different working techniques. I examined it on its internet utility.
Whereas creating a brand new endpoint, identical to Postman, you’ll be able to move your API URL, paste it, and provides it a reputation. It helps you to outline and save your information schema. For instance information, you need to use the ‘generate mechanically’ performance to autogenerate in response to your schema. If this have been Postman, you’d have to write down instance information within the API doc. APIdog generates it with one click on, saving ample time.
With APIdog, you get every little thing from improvement to API documentation technology in a single API instrument. The product proudly presents itself as one platform to interchange all, particularly Postman. Contemplate it whereas evaluating totally different alternate options for Postman.
APIdog is free for as much as 5 tasks and 4 customers. Past that, you’ll pay $9/consumer/month for a Fundamental plan.
From a usability standpoint, I discovered some options of APIdog lacking in Postman, like the flexibility to outline and reuse information schema. What’s extra, APIdog permits you to generate API specs from the request and acknowledge JSON/XML/SQL to schema. Postman doesn’t ship these options.
What I like about APIdog:
- It seems like an entire platform reasonably than a distributed set of functionalities packaged collectively in a instrument.
- From a debugging standpoint, the API doc connects with a database. Postman can not instantly join except there’s an API endpoint over it.
What G2 customers like about APIdog:
“It is ease of use and impression. With out an finish utility/shopper in sight, we will design, develop, take a look at, and make it prepared for the varied deliberate utilization throughout platforms and use circumstances, which makes it near 99.99%. Improvement and nonetheless some points might come up, however both under no circumstances or very minimal issues. So, it makes improvement very unbiased.”
– APIdog Overview, Steve P., Managing Director
What I dislike about APIdog:
- Personally, I’m not an incredible fan of their UI/UX proper now. Perhaps they’ll modify the aesthetics later. Nevertheless, when you want one thing purposeful, APIdog generally is a good instrument.
What G2 customers dislike about APIdog:
“Because of its featurefulness, it has a steep studying curve. Merely organising a single request and response is simple sufficient, however attempting to kind out an entire API and environments on it’ll show difficult.”
– APIdog Overview, Andres S, .Web Full Stack Software program Engineer
2. Bruno: An open-source, Git-integrated, and offline API consumer
Postman is perhaps essentially the most used API consumer in the marketplace, however Bruno wins relating to ease of use. And no, it’s not simply because its emblem is the founder’s canine or as a result of it’s an incredible pun on scaring the Postman away, however it genuinely delivers worth the place it must.
Bruno is open-source, made for offline use, and doesn’t require me to log in. Nonetheless, if you open it, you are able to do every little thing you’ll naturally do with an API consumer.
Bruno doesn’t have a proprietary cloud sync. It’s offline, and I like that essentially the most about it. There’s no syncing of information to any cloud, which helps me make sure that our information stays non-public.
Bruno’s native Git integration revolutionizes the established order set by Postman, Insomnia, and others. After I tried Postman, I used to be capped at round 25 assortment runs on the free plan. Nevertheless, there isn’t any such restrict on Bruno whereas it is freed from price. If you happen to go to its web site, you’ll see the professional plan. That’s primarily for options like a graphical consumer interface (GUI) assortment and open API technology.
What I like about Bruno:
- Bruno is particularly useful for these in search of a light-weight, easy-to-use API consumer. I don’t need to create an account, be on-line, or run my request by means of a proxy.
What G2 customers like about Bruno:
“Bruno is easy, intuitive, superb for builders and testers.”
– Bruno Overview, Rodrigo G., Improvement Specialist
What I dislike about Bruno:
- In contrast with Postman, Bruno lacks request chaining, flows, and mocks to simulate API servers. It additionally lacks some new AI options that Postman retains including. Nevertheless, because it’s for these in search of a light-weight consumer, it is comprehensible.
What G2 customers dislike about Bruno:
“It lacks some options current in alternate options like Postman.”
– Bruno Overview, Daniel G., Head of Knowledge, Analytics
3. Kong Insomnia: Finest for a easy UI with needed options
Kong Insomnia has a easy, intuitive interface, in contrast to Postman, which has grow to be bloated over time for easy API improvement and testing wants. Insomnia is reasonably elegant and easy to make use of.
Whereas testing, I discovered that Postman has an interceptor that takes all cookies from a logged-in session and considers that you just’re already logged into the API. Insomnia has an idea of plugins, however there’s no ready-to-use model for such use circumstances. If you happen to want this performance, Postman could be a more sensible choice.
Insomnia is geared towards customers who want an intuitive and structured surroundings. You get choices to work throughout varied forms of API with a lot flexibility. Most significantly, you don’t want an account to work on Insomnia domestically. You may simply get equipped and begin working.
What I like about Kong Insomnia:
- I like that Insomnia doesn’t dump a great deal of options that don’t make sense to me. It retains issues clear and easy whereas nonetheless being versatile sufficient to accommodate my improvement and API testing wants.
- It helps a variety of options, together with REST, GraphQL, and SOAP requests, making it a flexible instrument that I may use for varied tasks.
What G2 customers like about Kong Insomnia:
“It’s open supply and nicely documented. It has good protection of various authentication modes and surroundings variables. Top-of-the-line issues is the code technology for the calls.”
– Kong Insomnia Overview, Carlos V, CTO
What I dislike about Kong Insomnia:
- Insomnia AI is just out there within the Enterprise plan, which limits me from testing it.
What G2 customers dislike about Kong Insomnia:
“We can not create an Automation suite or write exams like we will do on Postman. Websocket help shouldn’t be out there. Mocking can also be not allowed.”
– Kong Insomnia Overview, Sumit T, Product Verification Engineer
4. Stoplight: Finest for designing, documenting, and testing APIs in a single place
Stoplight permits me to work with APIs cleanly and simply. Like Postman, I can take a look at my APIs, however Stoplight provides me a bit extra when planning and organizing them. I can design, doc, and take a look at APIs in a single place with the assistance of a pleasant visible editor with out writing uncooked code.
It permits me to create mock APIs. Earlier than constructing the precise backend, I used to be capable of arrange mock responses and share them with the group. This helps everybody keep on the identical web page. One other nice function? Stoplight creates docs from the API design itself; you don’t need to do something additional for the documentation half.
Highlight is a good instrument that works nicely for each solo builders and groups.
What I like about Stoplight:
- Its GUI may be very intuitive. Due to the UX, I may do every little thing needed and navigate the platform with out studying a lot documentation.
- I like its wealthy collaboration performance built-in with the duty administration system, which makes it simpler to depart feedback contextually and talk about the API floor.
What G2 customers like about Stoplight:
“One of many standout options of Stoplight.io is its user-friendly interface, which makes it accessible to each seasoned builders and newcomers. The platform’s well-designed format permits customers to navigate by means of varied sections effortlessly, together with designing APIs, defining information fashions, and producing complete documentation.
Furthermore, Stoplight.io provides quite a lot of instruments to boost API improvement. The “Design” function facilitates the creation of API endpoints, making it handy to mannequin and visualize information constructions utilizing the OpenAPI Specification. ”
– Stoplight Overview, Erik F., Knowledge Scientist
What I dislike about Stoplight:
- The price of premium options is increased, however related options can be found at a relatively cheaper price in different instruments.
What G2 customers dislike about Stoplight:
“It lacks bulk enhancing instruments, which may make issues barely guide, however when you’re aware of JSON/YAML, you could be extra environment friendly. For higher visibility, the publish function could be barely higher with extra context into what’s altering inside the API docs.”
– Stoplight Overview, Aman T., Buyer Success
5. SwaggerHub: Finest for pace and suppleness within the improvement course of
SwaggerHub offers a central platform for builders to design and put together API documentation. Its consumer interface is easy and clear, which makes it straightforward for brand spanking new customers to entry. My colleagues and I collaborated simply to develop documentation for a similar undertaking.
Most significantly, you get to check the APIs domestically earlier than deployment. You may export the code to the programming language and implement it rapidly. It helps all programming languages.
For my part, when you comply with an API design-first method, i.e., you outline the API specs earlier than implementation, Swagger could be a wonderful instrument for you. It helps you generate consumer SDKs and server stubs mechanically based mostly on the API specs. However, if API testing is your main focus, you need to persist with Postman. It permits for fast prototyping and iterations of APIs inside the instrument.
What I like about SwaggerHub:
- The automated technology of consumer and server SDKs in varied languages helps expedite the event course of.
- Enhancing the output doc individually from the code is versatile. The script’s output is instantaneous.
What G2 customers like essentially the most about SwaggerHub:
“Its structured documentations assist rather a lot whereas doing any integrations.”
– SwaggerHub Overview, Shivam G., Software program Engineer
What I dislike about SwaggerHub:
- I discovered that SwaggerHub’s authorization typically turns into glitchy, and I have to reauthorize it once more.
What G2 customers dislike about SwaggerHub:
“If we reload Swagger, then all of the request our bodies we made earlier for APIs will likely be erased. We should always have a persistence choice to avoid wasting requests. For instance, Postman helps saving requests, and so on. The Swagger Filter choice shouldn’t be up to speed.”
– SwaggerHub Overview, Varun T., Senior Software program Engineer
6. Thunder Consumer: Finest for testing APIs instantly in VS code editor
Thunder Consumer is a quick, easy-to-use API testing software program designed for the VS code editor. It permits you to create requests, manage them into collections, and construct environments for various phases, reminiscent of dev and manufacturing.
Thunder Consumer doesn’t attempt to do an excessive amount of, which I respect. I can simply entry request sorts (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, and so on.). It helps pre- and post-request scripts that come in useful to automate small duties like setting tokens. Not like REST shoppers, Thunder Consumer delivers a correct UI and higher workflow.
Postman’s VS code extension can also be highly effective, supporting distant process calls (gRPC), WebSocket, cURL, and higher surroundings administration. In comparison with Postman, Thunder Consumer is gentle and doesn’t distract me from coding. Postman is extra polished, but when I need one thing fast and environment friendly with out logging in or paying for group options, I’d go for Thunder Consumer. For me, it is about simplicity and pace.
What I like about Thunder Consumer:
- Thunder Consumer doesn’t require an web connection to work, which I like. I don’t want to change between VS Code and an API testing instrument, as Thunder Consumer is obtainable on the VS editor.
- It is considerably light-weight however has the mandatory options for API testing. It helps you to take a look at API responses with none scripting.
What G2 customers like about Thunder Consumer:
“I’ve used Thunder Consumer as an extension in VS Code, which was such a fantastic extension. It is vitally straightforward for a newbie to make use of. It had all of the issues that I needed to make use of. I may save my variables and in addition maintain all my API requests.”
– Thunder Consumer Overview, Shailesh B., Software program Engineer
What I dislike about Thunder Consumer:
- Collaboration is difficult in Thunder Consumer. Furthermore, it’s not as feature-rich as Postman, however this largely relies on the use case.
What G2 customers dislike about Thunder Consumer:
“The set up is perhaps lengthy or advanced to different customers, and the drawback is which you can not entry it on a cell machine. I wish to see enhancements on Thunder Consumer that make it accessible to any machine.”
– Thunder Consumer Overview, Thandiwe M., Challenge Supervisor
Comparability of one of the best Postman alternate options
Really feel like you could have an data overload? This comparability desk makes it simpler for you.
Postman alternate options | Finest for | Free model availability | Pricing |
APIdog | Collaborative work in API administration | Sure (with consumer and undertaking limits) | $9/month per consumer (Fundamental Plan) |
Bruno | Open-source and Git-integrated API consumer | Sure (open supply) | $6/month per consumer (Professional plan) |
Kong Insomnia | REST and GraphQL API testing and debugging | Sure (with limits on tasks) | Customized |
Stoplight | Designing APIs in OpenAPI and JSON Schema | Free trial out there | $41 / month (Fundamental plan) |
SwaggerHub | API design, documentation, and improvement collaboration | Free trial out there | $22.80 /month (Particular person plan) |
Thunder Consumer | Light-weight API testing inside Visible Studio Code | Sure, for non-commercial use with limits | $3/month per consumer (Starter Plan) |
Often requested questions on API platforms and Postman alternate options
1. Why is Postman so common?
Postman is common as a result of it simplifies API testing with an intuitive interface, automated workflows, and collaboration instruments. Builders use Postman to ship requests, examine responses, and automate take a look at circumstances. It helps REST, GraphQL, and SOAP, making it a flexible instrument for API improvement and debugging.
2. Is Postman higher than SwaggerHub?
Evaluating the 2, Postman is perhaps higher than SwaggerHub, and vice-versa, relying on the use case. SwaggerHub is a extra appropriate instrument when you comply with an API design-first method and outline API specs earlier than implementation. Nevertheless, if API testing is your main function, it’s finest to go for Postman.
3. Why is Insomnia higher than Postman?
Postman provides greater than a developer’s easy API improvement and testing wants. It turns into sophisticated, as you might want to eat deep documentation to make use of the function set that Postman provides. From a UI/UX perspective, Insomnia offers a easy and extra intuitive interface, making it a preferable selection for customers geared towards a structured surroundings and looking for an intuitive interface.
4. Is APIdog higher than Postman?
APIdog proudly claims to encapsulate the options and performance of Postman and varied different API improvement and testing instruments. The thought of a greater instrument relies on the use case. Nevertheless, I found in my analysis which you can generate information mechanically with APIdog however not with Postman.
Numerous different options and functionalities differ in how they enchantment to the consumer. The ultimate selection of the higher instrument relies on the consumer and their use case, for which they examine the choices.
5. Is Thunder Consumer higher than Postman?
Thunder Consumer is light-weight and quick, and in contrast to Postman, it provides a minimal UI. It’s good to check inside VS Code whereas utilizing easy options. Postman has many options, together with testing API inside VS Code. However its UI/UX may not be as minimal as Thunder Consumer’s, which is sort of pure.
6. What’s the finest Postman various in VS Code?
RapidAPI or Thunder Consumer are good Postman alternate options in VS Code choices.
On the lookout for one of the best Postman various is obscure, except:
You might have a transparent concept of what you want, or possibly why you’re not contemplating Postman. There are a number of alternate options out there for distinctive and particular use circumstances. For instance, Kong Insomnia delivers a a lot better UI than Postman, whereas Thunder Consumer delivers an API-testing product if you wish to take a look at inside VS Code.
Your function, want, and requirement will outline one of the best Postman alternate options on your use case. It’s finest to outline them clearly earlier than we go for the respective demos. This may assist you could have your pointers in place to make one of the best use of your time whereas conversing with the seller.
Try the whole listing of API administration instruments and discover all choices in the marketplace.